Why am I here? What am I doing? Who do I want to be?
Being abroad for 6 months, away from friends and family, living on a tight budget, with little access to the normal distractions and amusements gives one a lot of time to think about existential issues. Usually, I just spin round and round in my head, and once I am fatigued I simply decide to enjoy what is around: the view, the jokes, the ironies and oddities of everyday life. But every once in a while, I get a glimpse of insight into the bigger questions and issues invoked by this extra-ordinary adventure.
My latest batch of thoughts were inspired by Robert Strauss, the Peace Corps Director of Cameroon. The following are some excerpts from his monthly mailing, edited to focus on what I thought were the most interesting points.
******************************************************************************************************
Along with all the various hardships one faces in Cameroon, we are also confronted with the same questions that many Peace Corps Volunteers - here and around the world - continue to confront. "What am I doing?" Did I make the right choice?" "Why am I here?" "Why are we in Cameroon?" "People here aren't starving. Shouldn't I be working where people are starving?" Or "Why am I not working at home to alleviate poverty? There are more pressing needs just miles from where I used to live than there are here."
Since arriving in Cameroon I have conducted many interviews, met several dozen of you in the office and more in the field. Every interview has been interesting. Some have been challenging, other intriguing. None, unfortunately, has provided me with philosophical tautologies to answer any of these questions. What they have done is clarified some thoughts I have about how one can think about the fundamental questions of development and how we decide what to do now that we are here.
Development itself is a peculiar field. How do we define development? From whose point of view? The United States, in terms of material acquisition and infrastructure, is by most standards "developed." Yet judged on the basis of American rates of murder and family cohesiveness we are perhaps not so developed. In the face of such conflicting information, how do we think about what we are doing here in Cameroon?
Not long ago I took a seminar in which the facilitator asserted that seeking answers to "why" questions was a waste of time. Find out "why" you do something and so what? Where does that leave one? Every why question generates a reason as an answer which can provoke another "why." At the seminar the facilitator had us go through endless cycles of "why" and behind each answer, behind each reason, there was always another question and another reason. And the reasons, though self-satisfying and self-justifying, ultimately got us all nowhere. Likewise with "What am I doing?" and "Did I make the right choice?" kind of questions. These are questions, as my facilitator pointed out, that don't get us anywhere. They serve mainly as some type of psychological justification for what we have already done. They do little to get us where we want to be.
The questions to ask, the facilitator suggested, are, "Who do I want to be?" or "What am I personally committed to?" The answers to these types of question draw us into the future. In the face of adversity and challenge (as we are all likely to face in Peace Corps), the answers to these questions pull us toward a future that inspires us, toward a personal possibility and commitment. The answers to "Why am I here?" or "What (the hell) am I doing?" don't do this and more often than not come from something that is pushing us from behind - such saving face, or parental judgment, or finishing up something no matter what or how distasteful. How much more powerful it is to be drawn forward by a personal aspiration or commitment.
In any given situation in life, no matter the hardship, we can choose to commit ourselves to something that inspires and motivates us by answering the question, "Who do I want to be?" In a Peace Corps context, this could be being the best teacher one can be, being an inspiring and supportive manager, being a compassionate and irrepressible health educator, or maybe simply being a good listener. The character of commitment is often built around an adjective; compassionate, dedicated, adventurous, supportive, innovative. You can try a different one on each day - "Today I'm going to be adventurous" - until you find the one that works for and inspires you. The beauty of this approach is that we don't have to like what we are doing moment by moment because what we are doing moment by moment is motivated by the person we are committed to being rather than the actions we are taking. The actions are taken only in service to the commitment, not in and of themselves. So when teaching or managing is a drag, or when all the crops have withered, or when the funds have been diverted, or when people didn't show up when they said they would, yes, it's distressing, it's troubling, it's unfortunate, it's a pain. But ultimately - unless there is arterial bleeding going on - it doesn't matter because circumstances and emotions do not need to affect the person you have chosen to be. You can continue to choose to be that person. And your commitment can sustain and inspire you in the face of bad weather, broken promises, failed communication, and all the many other annoyances that can plague and get us down.
So decide who you want to be: bold, courageous, compassionate, loving, adventurous, and try it on. Walk in that character for a day or a week or a month and see how it feels. And how the world around you looks when you see if from the point of view of a personal commitment you have selected. And then let me know how it works and how if feels.




























